← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index
All times shown according to UTC.
Time | Nick | Message |
---|---|---|
00:44 | inlibro joined #koha | |
01:44 | inlibro joined #koha | |
01:49 | khall_ joined #koha | |
02:39 | AndrewFH joined #koha | |
02:44 | inlibro joined #koha | |
02:45 | khall joined #koha | |
03:44 | inlibro joined #koha | |
04:14 | khall joined #koha | |
04:44 | inlibro joined #koha | |
05:05 | khall_ joined #koha | |
05:45 | inlibro joined #koha | |
05:45 | fridolin joined #koha | |
05:46 | josef_moravec joined #koha | |
05:57 | enkidu joined #koha | |
06:09 | cait joined #koha | |
06:12 | chriss joined #koha | |
06:45 | inlibro joined #koha | |
07:06 | did joined #koha | |
07:08 | davidnind joined #koha | |
07:16 | huginn | News from kohagit: Bug 22818: Fix the last_insert_id call <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]84a171685b1b2a5ad> |
07:19 | severine_q joined #koha | |
07:19 | severine_q | good morning #koha ! |
07:28 | cait joined #koha | |
07:41 | magnuse | bonjour severine_q & #koha! |
07:45 | alex_a joined #koha | |
07:45 | inlibro joined #koha | |
07:45 | alex_a | Bonjour |
07:51 | magnuse | bonjour alex_a |
07:51 | alex_a | Salutation magnuse |
07:56 | lds joined #koha | |
07:58 | fridolin joined #koha | |
08:00 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_U16 build #128: SUCCESS in 44 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_U16/128/ |
08:01 | cait1 joined #koha | |
08:03 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_U2010 build #49: SUCCESS in 47 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]_Master_U2010/49/ |
08:03 | severine_q | hi @magnuse alex_a :) |
08:04 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_D11 build #141: NOW UNSTABLE in 48 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_D11/141/ |
08:12 | cait joined #koha | |
08:13 | cait | good morning all :) |
08:16 | magnuse | hiya cait |
08:21 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_D9_My8 build #464: SUCCESS in 1 hr 4 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]aster_D9_My8/464/ |
08:26 | fridolin joined #koha | |
08:34 | ashimema | mornin' #koha |
08:35 | Joubu | did: git pull, see last commit! |
08:37 | mtj | hey #koha |
08:38 | ashimema: i did a bit more looking at bug 26893, i think you are correct :) | |
08:38 | huginn | Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]_bug.cgi?id=26893 blocker, P5 - low, ---, koha-bugs, NEW , New version of JSON::Validator (D11) break our REST API routes |
08:39 | did | Joubu: yep , thanks |
08:40 | cait | someoen else glad it's Friday? |
08:40 | mtj | ...we had a similar problem on buster with incompatble versions of json-validator and Mojolicious::Plugin::OpenAPI |
08:43 | cait: me too | |
08:43 | cait | :) |
08:43 | severine_q | oh yes cait !! |
08:45 | inlibro joined #koha | |
08:46 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_D9_MDB_Latest build #441: SUCCESS in 46 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]9_MDB_Latest/441/ |
08:46 | magnuse | cait: yes! |
08:50 | mtj | ashimema: i did make some progress and built the latest Mojolicious::Plugin::OpenAPI (3.40) on d11, with its tests passing OK |
08:51 | Joubu | mtj: great |
08:52 | mtj: how does it turn out? | |
08:52 | ashimema | oh nice, thanks mtj |
08:53 | mtj | ...but sadly, the koha tests did not pass with the updated modules? :'( |
08:53 | ashimema | I didn't mean to throw out your idea of updating Koha.. I had just already tried that route before suggesting the packaging route to fixing the issue |
08:53 | Joubu | same ones are failing? |
08:53 | ashimema | dang, that's not so good :( |
08:53 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_U20 build #143: STILL UNSTABLE in 50 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_U20/143/ |
08:54 | mtj | hmm, yes same ones are failing, with similar errors (i think) |
08:54 | ashimema | I think we generally need to get strict about locking down a Mojo + OpenAPI + JSON::Validator versions.. they're all really closely tied to each other.. updating them out of order is kinda asking for trouble |
08:54 | interesting | |
08:55 | mtj | ashimema: there is a problem with forcing an older pkg version, via the deb/control file too :/ |
08:56 | ashimema | had a feeling there might be.. |
08:56 | it's not an area I'm close enough to :( | |
08:56 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_D9 build #1495: SUCCESS in 52 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_D9/1495/ |
08:58 | Joubu | mtj: what's the problem? |
08:58 | wahanui | somebody said the problem was it has several code issues |
09:00 | mtj | ..the problem is that apt always selects the newer pkg, as both apt repos have the same '500' priority |
09:02 | ...a fix could be to tell users to make the kc repo have a higher priority (like 600) - which would allow apt to select an older pkg | |
09:03 | ^ its not a very nice solution :/ | |
09:03 | Joubu | it's not |
09:05 | mtj | currently D11's J::V (4.10) and Mojolicious::Plugin::OpenAPI (2.21) modules are incompatible |
09:05 | (and D10 has incompatible versions too) | |
09:06 | ashimema, Joubu - does this info apply to koha? -> https://metacpan.org/pod/relea[…]ides/Swagger2.pod | |
09:06 | "This guide is useful if your application is already using Mojolicious::Plugin::Swagger2." | |
09:10 | ashimema | it could very well do |
09:11 | we certainly used the Swagger2 plugin in the early days.. I wasn't part of the effort to move us to OpenAPI | |
09:12 | mtj | ah yes.. we have moved from swagger to openapi - i think it doesnt apply then |
09:12 | ashimema | looking at the code, I think we upgraded properly |
09:12 | i.e. we're not using that around_action hook.. | |
09:13 | instead we updated the few controllers we had already written to not use the old passing structures | |
09:13 | indeed | |
09:13 | mtj | i'll set up a jenkins test with the new modules so we can properly compare failed tests |
09:14 | ashimema | thanks mtj |
09:14 | mtj | i think we are on the correct track for a fix |
09:14 | ashimema | it feels like we're moving towards upping our minimum versions for these libs.. which has me wondering how hard it will be to backport the newer one's to older OS's |
09:15 | oh.. btw.. Joubu the release notes still claim support for Jessie and MySQL 5.5... I'm sure I dropped those or said we would drop them with 20.05... we should remove them from the supported list for 20.11 I reckon | |
09:15 | D8 is officially out of support by debian these days | |
09:16 | TimothyAlexis joined #koha | |
09:16 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_D10 build #406: SUCCESS in 54 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_D10/406/ |
09:16 | TimothyAlexis | I'm thinking about solving 9565 |
09:16 | bug 9565 | |
09:17 | huginn | Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]w_bug.cgi?id=9565 normal, P5 - low, ---, koha-bugs, NEW , Deleting a biblio should alert/fail if there are existent subscriptions |
09:17 | TimothyAlexis | With the same functionality as when there are existent items. |
09:17 | Joubu | ashimema: yes, it's on my list. It's hardcoded from the release tools. |
09:18 | ashimema: it needs to be adjusted on release day | |
09:19 | ashimema | agreed |
09:19 | I did wonder about setting it based on version in the config | |
09:19 | so that the rmaints can still get it appearing | |
09:19 | I think that's why it came back | |
09:28 | TimothyAlexis | There's this in cat-toolbar.inc: |
09:28 | [% IF ( count ) %] | |
09:28 | It counts the items attached to the biblio. | |
09:29 | Is there something similarly easy to check if there's a subscription attached to the biblio? | |
09:29 | koha-jenkins | Yippee, build fixed! |
09:29 | wahanui | Congratulations! |
09:29 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_D10_Deps build #136: FIXED in 43 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ter_D10_Deps/136/ |
09:33 | Joubu | TimothyAlexis: if you have the biblio object you can: biblio.subscriptions.count |
09:33 | josef_moravec left #koha | |
09:33 | kohaputti joined #koha | |
09:34 | TimothyAlexis | detail.pl has this: $template->param(biblio => $biblio); |
09:35 | * kohaputti | drowns in plack-error.log warnings |
09:36 | TimothyAlexis | Joubu++ |
09:36 | Got it, thank you | |
09:38 | khall joined #koha | |
09:44 | khall_ joined #koha | |
09:45 | inlibro joined #koha | |
09:45 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_U18 build #946: SUCCESS in 52 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_U18/946/ |
09:46 | Project Koha_Master_U20 build #144: STILL UNSTABLE in 49 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_U20/144/ | |
09:59 | TimothyAlexis | bug 9565 is ready for sign off |
09:59 | huginn | Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]w_bug.cgi?id=9565 normal, P5 - low, ---, koha-bugs, NEW , Deleting a biblio should alert/fail if there are existent subscriptions |
10:19 | mtj | hi ashimema, Joubu, you can see D11 building mojolicious-plugin-openapi here -> https://gitlab.com/mjames/ktd-[…]/-/jobs/847580267 |
10:19 | ..just for the log :) | |
10:21 | severine_q | TimothyAlexis : I update status to NSO for bug 9565, for I can't sign it as it's NEW |
10:21 | huginn | Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]w_bug.cgi?id=9565 normal, P5 - low, ---, koha-bugs, NEW , Deleting a biblio should alert/fail if there are existent subscriptions |
10:22 | mtj | something odd that i cannot explain, is if you swap 'cpanm -n json-validator' with 'apt install json-validator' the tests fail?! |
10:27 | like that.. -> https://gitlab.com/mjames/ktd-[…]/-/jobs/847606026 | |
10:33 | Joubu | mtj: it's familiar to me, I got that when I tried few days ago. |
10:34 | mtj | hmm, it seems that D11's libjson-validator-perl(4.10+dfsg-1) is somehow broken...? |
10:37 | Joubu | don't you think we should contact mojolicious-plugin-openapi debian maintainer? |
10:38 | or directly mojo's authors | |
10:41 | mtj | Joubu: yes :) |
10:42 | ..its a debian problem, i think | |
10:43 | alex_a joined #koha | |
10:45 | mtj | i recently discovered that the debian perl packages dont run any of their ./t tests |
10:45 | inlibro joined #koha | |
10:47 | ashimema | yikes |
10:48 | mtj | oops, fake news... https://ci.debian.net/packages[…]l/unstable/amd64/ |
10:49 | ashimema | huh |
10:57 | mtj | ashimema: i think ci.debian.net is running the tests, so ignore my previous statement |
10:58 | enkidu joined #koha | |
11:15 | cait1 joined #koha | |
11:15 | * ashimema | is currently upgrading a pretty old Koha... |
11:16 | ashimema | always fun |
11:20 | khall joined #koha | |
11:21 | enkidu | goog luck ashimema ! |
11:21 | ^good | |
11:21 | khall_ joined #koha | |
11:22 | * ashimema | is happy to say he's seen the back of all the 2.2 upgrades he had to do back in the day... this one is childs play in comparison to those .. hehe |
11:22 | magnuse | ashimema: how old? |
11:23 | ashimema | 3.22 |
11:23 | so not THAT old ;) | |
11:23 | but there are a few monster DB updates | |
11:24 | we have a couple of 16.11's still lurking too.. those have been waiting for all their customisations to make it into community.. something I think I've at last succeeded in doing with the release of 20.11! | |
11:24 | Joubu | ashimema: bug 26997 - in case you face it |
11:24 | huginn | Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]_bug.cgi?id=26997 normal, P5 - low, ---, jonathan.druart, Needs Signoff , Database Mysql Version 8.0.22 failed to Update During Upgrade |
11:24 | ashimema | 4 years.. suppose that's not too terrible |
11:25 | oh, good call | |
11:25 | thankfully not on mysql8 yet for this one | |
11:25 | but I have seen loads of those errors on my dev systems actually | |
11:25 | magnuse | ashimema++ |
11:26 | ashimema | nice to see.. I'll take a look at that patch :) |
11:27 | interesting.. so you hide them in the upgrade with your patch.. but then the person says they just re-appear in live running | |
11:27 | not great | |
11:28 | * ashimema | wonders if a script for removing those should be run prior to any mysql8 upgrades |
11:28 | ashimema | bit odd that the mysql8 update itself doesn't flag those issues |
11:31 | davidnind left #koha | |
11:46 | inlibro joined #koha | |
12:00 | Joubu | ashimema: no, the DBMS won't accept date with 0000-00-00 |
12:00 | so if you are running MySQL8 then you don't have such values | |
12:01 | ashimema: I am on a follow-up for the second error reported on that bug | |
12:01 | well, after lunch! | |
12:01 | ashimema | :) |
12:04 | severine_q | help fridolin, all sandbox are dead :( |
12:06 | AndrewFH joined #koha | |
12:08 | ashimema | using the biblibre ones severine_q ? |
12:08 | severine_q | oh there are 2 provisioned but also dead :/ |
12:09 | I wanted to test some unimarc stuff | |
12:22 | ashimema | grr |
12:22 | khall joined #koha | |
12:22 | ashimema | these darn sandboxes are starting to really bug me.. |
12:31 | severine_q | sorry ashimema :/ |
12:44 | kohaputti | we have two different OO coding styles in use: first is sub set_index_status(XXX) together with sub get_index_status() then another one style is sub index_status() together with sub index_status(XXX) |
12:44 | AndrewFH joined #koha | |
12:44 | kohaputti | which one we should start using? |
12:46 | inlibro joined #koha | |
12:46 | tcohen | accessors should be accessors i.e. $patron->name('') should be an accessor |
12:46 | you can get and set with the same call style | |
12:46 | but sometimes we put get_ set_ | |
12:47 | for calculated or not accessor methods | |
12:47 | for example $patron->set_password | |
12:47 | Joubu | Koha::Patron->extended_attributes is a good example I think |
12:47 | tcohen | while there's a 'password' attribute, setting the password shouldn't be confused with an accessor |
12:48 | kohaputti | ok, just a moment while I go read more about what you just mentioned, will get back soon with follow-up questions |
12:49 | Joubu | I'd be in favor of: set_ when only set (password example), get_ when is just an accessor (you don't have necessarily a set_ corresponding method), and ->stuff for both set and get (like extended_attributes) |
12:49 | fridolin | severine_q: i look :D |
12:50 | ashimema | Joubu++ |
12:50 | Joubu | (and is_* when return a boolean, we almost already agreed on that) |
12:50 | kohaputti | (I was doing code review of https://bugs.koha-community.or[…]07612&action=diff for sub message_transport_types) |
12:50 | that is both getter and setter | |
12:50 | ashimema | no worries severine_q , it's not your fault.. I'm just a bit stuck as to why the sandboxes are suddenly so fragile |
12:51 | tuxayo around? | |
12:52 | @later tell tuxayo if your happy to finish off your testing of bug 25761 then feel free to convert my SO to a PQA ;) | |
12:52 | huginn | ashimema: The operation succeeded. |
12:52 | Joubu | kohaputti: I'd make it behave like extended_attributes, and return the mmt after a "set" call |
12:53 | kohaputti | Joubu, mmt? |
12:55 | fridolin | severine_q: better , was missing a new perl dep |
12:56 | Joubu | kohaputti: message transport types |
12:57 | severine_q | thanks fridolin ! |
12:58 | hope you can solve it as "easily" as frido ashimema ! | |
13:01 | tuxayo | ashimema: hi o/ |
13:02 | ashimema | Hi tuxayo |
13:02 | Nice work trying to get to grips with sip | |
13:02 | fridolin | we still need to recreate our sandboxes with the docker system |
13:05 | tuxayo | ashimema: thanks, I'll retest the bug and try to QA it :) |
13:05 | severine_q | i still need to learn how I can install my one devbox... |
13:05 | tcohen | severine_q what OS? |
13:05 | magnuse | severine_q: better to look at koha-testing-docker, perhaps |
13:05 | severine_q | windows 10 :/ |
13:06 | magnuse | so a reserve that has an itemnumber, but item_level_hold = 0 -- that shouldn't really happen? |
13:08 | ashimema | present in your inbox tuxayo |
13:09 | Joubu | magnuse: indeed, should not happen |
13:10 | actually | |
13:10 | it could have happened | |
13:11 | tuxayo | Thanks ashimema ^^ I was able to get it from the Internet Wayback Machine and find the link from the SIP Wikipedia page. |
13:11 | Thanks for confirming it's the right document and version, I wasn't sure. | |
13:11 | ashimema | :) |
13:11 | Joubu | magnuse: the upgrade does not deal with existing entries in reserves |
13:11 | that's a bug | |
13:11 | ashimema | the golden nugget is to use Sip::Constants.pm to help understand the overly cryptic docs |
13:12 | magnuse | Joubu: looks like it will happen when found=w |
13:13 | Joubu: which upgrade are you thinking of? | |
13:13 | make that found=w|t | |
13:13 | Joubu | magnuse: can you confirm it happens for holds placed on an item (still in reserves) before 19.06.00.005 |
13:13 | ? | |
13:14 | tuxayo | ashimema: thanks, that will help to put the pieces of the puzzle together :) |
13:14 | ashimema | did I imagine a bug that re-synced etc/SIPConfig.xml with debian/templates/SIPConfig/xml |
13:15 | tuxayo | ashimema: I didn't get that in the ticket, what's up to syncing these files? |
13:15 | ashimema | well.. they're out of sync and shouldn't be.. |
13:15 | magnuse | Joubu: hm, i only see one occurence of it. the hold was placed through the REST API and it was not meant to happen, the library does not allow item lever holds |
13:15 | ashimema | they're both templates for the config file |
13:16 | one is for installs using 'make' and the other is for debian packages | |
13:16 | tuxayo | ok! |
13:16 | So not the same default conf ^^" | |
13:16 | ashimema | as a general rule we souhld try to keep any such templates in sync accross the two place |
13:16 | exactly | |
13:16 | tuxayo | etc and debian/templates, that's good to know |
13:17 | magnuse | (ah, reserves.item_level_hold was added by the upgrade to 19.11) |
13:17 | ashimema | well... it might be as I think within the scripts we also set defaults which correspond to the defaults in the template config files for when the elements are missing |
13:18 | Joubu | magnuse: has the hold been placed before the upgrade? :) |
13:19 | At first glance the code in AddReserve look ok to me, we should not have inconsistencies between those 2 fields. Even if called by the API route | |
13:21 | magnuse | Joubu: yes before the upgrade |
13:22 | i thought there were several where "itemnumber is not null and item_level_hold = 0" but all of them except one have found=w|t, so not a big problem. it could be a reverted waiting hold, as discussed in bug 9834 | |
13:22 | huginn | Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]w_bug.cgi?id=9834 normal, P5 - low, ---, jonathan.druart, CLOSED FIXED, Reverting a waiting hold should lead to the former hold type (item or biblio level) |
13:23 | AndrewFH joined #koha | |
13:24 | Joubu | not a big problem but it's a bug in the upgrade process :) |
13:25 | we should have updated the item level field, not setting all them to 0 | |
13:26 | huginn | News from kohagit: Bug 26988: Adjust for bug 26963 <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]87f2c8f32b11ea1eb> |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26988: No need to check if hold is linked to a patron <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]6cd8219959f1ab205> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26963: Ignore existing libraries <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]da7f2fcabbc0a15d7> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26963: (QA follow-up) Migrate unit tests into pickup_location <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]d10149b72a427cf54> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26963: (QA follow-up) Update mocked return of pickup_locations <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]82b991795ca5abb8a> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26988: (follow-up) Change event to focus <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]03be9deff3d6a0199> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26963: (QA follow-up) Fix cases where we expected a list <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]31793438ebcffc076> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26963: (QA follow-up) Fix up tests and cover case of undefined ccode <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]0df45a1db53e51530> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26963: (QA follow-up) Don't delete existing data before tests <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]ad387f018a91d0fd7> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26963: (QA follow-up) Convert to ResultSets <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]06084f71dfc9eebcc> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26988: (follow-up) Fix filter and encode api values and escape rendered values <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]728e3815895d10c56> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26988: (follow-up) Adjust code to use api field names <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]aa4a287e4fb7c6998> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26963: (follow-up) Change subroutine name for QA tools <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]f07fb9aa5d4d77c37> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26963: Unit tests <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]8afdcc6052f55d61a> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26988: (QA follow-up) Make the API return proper library objects <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]1746bf7f590205fe3> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26988: Make ->patron prefetchable <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]11ad32dfe2a153e3f> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26988: Add API route to fetch hold pickup locations and use it in the holds table <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]a538d19efc41fa1e1> | |
13:26 | News from kohagit: Bug 26963: Don't call 'can_be_transferred' for each possible library for each item <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]fcab2fa43c0b3ffb5> | |
13:39 | magnuse | Joubu: yeah, that is true |
13:46 | inlibro joined #koha | |
14:01 | khall joined #koha | |
14:06 | severine_q | fridolin again... any chance to see sandbox 11 with ES working ? |
14:07 | Joubu | severine_q: did you try http://sb1.sandboxes.bywatersolutions.com/create ? |
14:07 | you can select unimarc, then if you switch the search engine syspref it should just work | |
14:07 | *should* | |
14:08 | maybe not, ashimema do you know if we have the ES env var set when the sandbox is building? | |
14:09 | ashimema | er.. |
14:09 | pass | |
14:09 | snadboxes need some work.. :( | |
14:10 | severine_q | thanks Joubu ! I hope I'll have a bit of chance, I didn't see them working theses days :/ |
14:11 | Dyrcona joined #koha | |
14:11 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_U16 build #129: SUCCESS in 45 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_U16/129/ |
14:12 | Joubu | ashimema: http://paste.koha-community.org/26130 |
14:12 | that will set ES by default | |
14:12 | ashimema | :) |
14:13 | issue for now is that the sandboxes keep falling over :( | |
14:13 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_D11 build #142: STILL UNSTABLE in 46 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_D11/142/ |
14:13 | ashimema | but yes.. we should certainly enable that |
14:13 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_U2010 build #50: SUCCESS in 47 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]_Master_U2010/50/ |
14:14 | Joubu | do you know what's the problem with sandboxes? |
14:18 | ashimema | not a clue |
14:18 | they just seem to magically stop working | |
14:19 | severine_q | ByWater's are KO too, any informations in the logs ? I'm definitely unable to read them :( |
14:22 | ashimema | grr |
14:23 | seems we're back to a temp directory failure | |
14:24 | fridolin | severine_q : https://wiki.koha-community.or[…]andboxes#BibLibre try sandbox 11 |
14:24 | arf ok no, its ES5 | |
14:25 | we have to work on this | |
14:25 | Joubu | ashimema: df? |
14:26 | ashimema | nope |
14:26 | only used 35% | |
14:26 | 30gb disk spare | |
14:27 | severine_q | thanks fridolin for trying, no emergency so don't worry :) |
14:27 | Anthony joined #koha | |
14:29 | Guest5744 | Anyone online that can tell me why I haven't been able to get a response for being added to the paid services area of the website? Been trying to do this for over 4 months without a reply. |
14:30 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_D9_My8 build #465: SUCCESS in 1 hr 3 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]aster_D9_My8/465/ |
14:32 | ashimema | severine_q ours are back for a while |
14:32 | not sure how long it will last | |
14:32 | the issue is a really odd one | |
14:33 | severine_q | great ashimema !! |
14:33 | long enough for bug 25030 you think ? | |
14:33 | huginn | Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]_bug.cgi?id=25030 normal, P5 - low, ---, koha-bugs, Needs Signoff , IncludeSeeFromInSearches not honoured in Elasticsearch |
14:34 | Guest5744 | Anyone online that can tell me why I haven't been able to get a response for being added to the paid services area of the website? Been trying to do this for over 4 months without a reply. |
14:34 | ashimema | ah.. |
14:34 | I've not enabled the line Joubu suggested yet to get ES up and running.. | |
14:34 | I think | |
14:35 | severine_q | no worry, i think it's too late for that one anyway |
14:35 | ashimema | give it 1 minute then you should be able to |
14:35 | sorry severine_q | |
14:36 | khall joined #koha | |
14:41 | severine_q | thanks ashimema for trying :) it was really kind of you |
14:42 | Guest5744 | Anyone online that can tell me why I haven't been able to get a response for being added to the paid services area of the website? Been trying to do this for over 4 months without a reply. |
14:42 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_U18 build #947: ABORTED in 11 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_U18/947/ |
14:42 | ashimema | cait: |
14:43 | ^ | |
14:43 | Joubu | aborted koha-jenkins? |
14:43 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_D10_Deps build #137: FAILURE in 1 min 39 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ter_D10_Deps/137/ |
14:46 | Joubu | failure, even better |
14:46 | inlibro joined #koha | |
14:56 | magnuse | have a nice weekend, #koha! |
14:56 | tcohen | bye @magnuse |
14:57 | Joubu | same, bye #koha! |
14:58 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_D9_MDB_Latest build #442: SUCCESS in 46 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]9_MDB_Latest/442/ |
15:00 | caroline | translation question... should this string be translated? Looks like code, but I'm not sure "%s %s [%% IF ( OpacAdvSearchMoreOptions and OpacAdvSearchMoreOptions.size > 0 and expanded_options ) or ( OpacAdvSearchOptions and OpacAdvSearchOptions.size > 0 and not expanded_options ) %%] " |
15:01 | koha-jenkins | Yippee, build fixed! |
15:01 | wahanui | Congratulations! |
15:01 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_U20 build #145: FIXED in 47 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_U20/145/ |
15:05 | Project Koha_Master_D9 build #1496: SUCCESS in 52 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_D9/1496/ | |
15:19 | JesseM joined #koha | |
15:31 | did joined #koha | |
15:40 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_D10 build #407: SUCCESS in 56 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_D10/407/ |
15:40 | Project Koha_20.05_D9 build #116: SUCCESS in 41 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]oha_20.05_D9/116/ | |
15:41 | fridolin left #koha | |
15:44 | enkidu joined #koha | |
15:46 | inlibro joined #koha | |
15:51 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_D9_My8 build #114: SUCCESS in 49 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]20.05_D9_My8/114/ |
15:51 | Project Koha_20.05_U16 build #113: SUCCESS in 45 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U16/113/ | |
16:16 | lisettelatah joined #koha | |
16:19 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_U18 build #117: SUCCESS in 39 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U18/117/ |
16:25 | tuxayo | @later tell khall sandbox: it seems using a past sandbox name makes a new sandbox break |
16:25 | huginn | tuxayo: The operation succeeded. |
16:26 | tuxayo | ashimema that seems to be another issue for the PTFS-E ones :( |
16:26 | (other than name reuse) | |
16:30 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_U20 build #151: UNSTABLE in 50 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U20/151/ |
16:40 | Project Koha_Master_U18 build #948: SUCCESS in 48 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_U18/948/ | |
16:40 | cait | caroline: don't translate it |
16:40 | ashimema: Guest is no longer hereand not sure which entry that was meant to be? | |
16:40 | cait left #koha | |
16:46 | inlibro joined #koha | |
16:47 | ashimema | indeed |
16:47 | cait joined #koha | |
16:47 | ashimema | I've seen a few people come on for 30s, complain about not having been added yet.. then dissapear |
16:47 | honestly.. I've not seen a decent request on the mailing list for a while to be honest. | |
16:55 | I'm clocking off I'm afraid | |
17:03 | koha-jenkins | Yippee, build fixed! |
17:03 | wahanui | Congratulations! |
17:03 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_Master_D10_Deps build #138: FIXED in 43 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ter_D10_Deps/138/ |
17:24 | Project Koha_20.05_D11 build #60: STILL UNSTABLE in 1 hr 33 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]oha_20.05_D11/60/ | |
17:25 | Project Koha_20.05_D9 build #117: SUCCESS in 45 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]oha_20.05_D9/117/ | |
17:28 | Project Koha_20.05_D9_My8 build #115: SUCCESS in 58 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]20.05_D9_My8/115/ | |
17:33 | severine_q joined #koha | |
17:43 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_U16 build #114: SUCCESS in 39 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U16/114/ |
17:47 | inlibro joined #koha | |
18:09 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_D10 build #114: SUCCESS in 44 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_D10/114/ |
18:10 | Project Koha_20.05_U18 build #118: SUCCESS in 44 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U18/118/ | |
18:19 | Yippee, build fixed! | |
18:19 | wahanui | Congratulations! |
18:19 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_U20 build #152: FIXED in 50 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U20/152/ |
18:27 | Project Koha_20.05_D9_My8 build #116: SUCCESS in 44 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]20.05_D9_My8/116/ | |
18:29 | tuxayo | @later tell khall nevermind, the sandbox issues look random |
18:29 | huginn | tuxayo: The operation succeeded. |
18:47 | inlibro joined #koha | |
18:52 | koha-jenkins | Yippee, build fixed! |
18:52 | wahanui | Congratulations! |
18:52 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_U2010 build #2: FIXED in 43 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U2010/2/ |
18:56 | Project Koha_20.05_D9 build #118: SUCCESS in 46 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]oha_20.05_D9/118/ | |
19:06 | Project Koha_20.05_U18 build #119: UNSTABLE in 39 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U18/119/ | |
19:11 | enkidu joined #koha | |
19:14 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_U16 build #115: SUCCESS in 54 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U16/115/ |
19:40 | Project Koha_20.05_U20 build #153: SUCCESS in 44 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U20/153/ | |
19:47 | inlibro joined #koha | |
19:49 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_D9_My8 build #117: SUCCESS in 42 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]20.05_D9_My8/117/ |
20:10 | Project Koha_20.05_D9 build #119: SUCCESS in 55 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]oha_20.05_D9/119/ | |
20:24 | Project Koha_20.05_D11 build #61: STILL UNSTABLE in 1 hr 31 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]oha_20.05_D11/61/ | |
20:24 | lukeG joined #koha | |
20:26 | koha-jenkins | Yippee, build fixed! |
20:26 | wahanui | Congratulations! |
20:26 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_U18 build #120: FIXED in 45 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U18/120/ |
20:29 | Project Koha_20.05_D9 build #120: FAILURE in 2 min 3 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]oha_20.05_D9/120/ | |
20:29 | Project Koha_20.05_U16 build #116: SUCCESS in 40 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U16/116/ | |
20:47 | inlibro joined #koha | |
21:01 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_U20 build #154: SUCCESS in 50 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U20/154/ |
21:07 | khall joined #koha | |
21:07 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_D10 build #115: SUCCESS in 42 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_D10/115/ |
21:09 | Project Koha_20.05_U18 build #121: SUCCESS in 39 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U18/121/ | |
21:09 | tallerjoy joined #koha | |
21:16 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_D9_My8 build #118: SUCCESS in 47 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]20.05_D9_My8/118/ |
21:17 | Project Koha_20.05_U20 build #155: FAILURE in 1 min 12 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U20/155/ | |
21:23 | tallestjoy joined #koha | |
21:46 | khall joined #koha | |
21:47 | inlibro joined #koha | |
21:50 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_U2010 build #3: SUCCESS in 43 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U2010/3/ |
21:52 | Yippee, build fixed! | |
21:52 | wahanui | Congratulations! |
21:52 | koha-jenkins | Project Koha_20.05_D9 build #121: FIXED in 42 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]oha_20.05_D9/121/ |
21:53 | Project Koha_20.05_D11 build #62: FAILURE in 2 min 46 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]oha_20.05_D11/62/ | |
21:55 | Project Koha_20.05_D9_My8 build #119: FAILURE in 3 min 8 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]20.05_D9_My8/119/ | |
21:55 | Project Koha_20.05_D10 build #116: FAILURE in 2 min 36 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_D10/116/ | |
21:56 | Project Koha_20.05_U16 build #117: SUCCESS in 55 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U16/117/ | |
21:58 | Project Koha_20.05_U2010 build #4: FAILURE in 2 min 32 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U2010/4/ | |
21:59 | Project Koha_20.05_U20 build #156: STILL FAILING in 3 min 11 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U20/156/ | |
21:59 | Project Koha_20.05_D9 build #122: FAILURE in 2 min 35 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]oha_20.05_D9/122/ | |
22:01 | Project Koha_20.05_U16 build #118: FAILURE in 2 min 1 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U16/118/ | |
22:01 | Project Koha_20.05_D11 build #63: STILL FAILING in 2 min 47 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]oha_20.05_D11/63/ | |
22:01 | Project Koha_20.05_D9_My8 build #120: STILL FAILING in 2 min 25 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]20.05_D9_My8/120/ | |
22:03 | Project Koha_20.05_D10 build #117: STILL FAILING in 2 min 25 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_D10/117/ | |
22:04 | Project Koha_20.05_U18 build #122: SUCCESS in 46 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U18/122/ | |
22:04 | Project Koha_20.05_D9 build #123: STILL FAILING in 2 min 47 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]oha_20.05_D9/123/ | |
22:05 | Project Koha_20.05_U20 build #157: STILL FAILING in 2 min 9 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U20/157/ | |
22:05 | Project Koha_20.05_U18 build #123: FAILURE in 1 min 21 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U18/123/ | |
22:06 | Project Koha_20.05_U2010 build #5: STILL FAILING in 2 min 18 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_20.05_U2010/5/ | |
22:07 | tallerjoy joined #koha | |
22:48 | inlibro joined #koha | |
23:48 | inlibro joined #koha |
← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index