← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index
All times shown according to UTC.
Time | Nick | Message |
---|---|---|
00:14 | fridolin joined #koha | |
05:52 | fridolin joined #koha | |
07:31 | fridolin left #koha | |
08:52 | semarie joined #koha | |
09:19 | semarie | hum. in 21.11.01-1, the search page seems wrong: the main link on title is .../detail.pl?biblionumber=NOT-A-BIBLIONUMBER |
09:19 | and I have the same on opac | |
09:21 | the number in url is the "Numéro de notice" (maybe notice number when untranslated ?) | |
10:26 | it is odd. the xslt is getting marc:controlfield[@tag=001] as biblionumber, so the behaviour I am seeing now seems right, but I get a 404 on the page | |
10:27 | the problem seems that my 001 isn't the biblionumber... but it worked before | |
10:33 | ah, it could be related to Bug 12561. it removes non-XSLT views. so if I were still using that, I might to work as before | |
10:34 | huginn` | Bug https://bugs.koha-community.or[…]_bug.cgi?id=12561 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, jonathan.druart+koha, Pushed to master , Remove non-XSLT views |
10:46 | semarie | so I think I have to reconfigure some parts of cataloguing to correctly set 100 to biblionumber, and next regenerate biblio tables (with batchRebuildBiblioTables.pl) |
10:58 | cait joined #koha | |
11:12 | semarie | I would appreciate any help on how to achieve this |
13:54 | tcohen joined #koha | |
13:57 | tcohen joined #koha | |
16:05 | cait | semarie: are you using UNIMARC or MARC21? |
16:55 | semarie | cait: UNIMARC |
16:57 | janPasi_ joined #koha | |
16:57 | lari joined #koha | |
16:57 | jajm joined #koha | |
16:57 | tuxayo joined #koha | |
16:57 | ashimema joined #koha | |
16:57 | Nemo_bis joined #koha | |
16:58 | cait | semarie: sorry we keep missing each other - I think 001 = biblionumber is standard for UNIMARC, but there might have been older frameworks around at some point |
16:58 | where do you have your biblionumber? | |
17:01 | semarie | in the "Liens Koha => MARC" entry, I am seeing biblio.biblionumber in field 90, subfield 9 . but I am not able to see it inside a MARC view |
17:02 | cait | have you set it to visible? |
17:02 | that could be a reason for trouble as the marc framework visibility settings take more effect in newer versions | |
17:02 | your biblionumber field should be set to visible in OPAC and everywhere | |
17:03 | janPasi_ joined #koha | |
17:03 | lari joined #koha | |
17:03 | jajm joined #koha | |
17:03 | tuxayo joined #koha | |
17:03 | ashimema joined #koha | |
17:03 | Nemo_bis joined #koha | |
17:04 | semarie | where is the configuration of field visibility ? |
17:05 | cait | in Administratoin > Bilbiographic MARC frameworks > Marc structure... |
17:06 | semarie | ok. so it is marked "ignored" (so invisible) |
17:06 | cait | hm yeah, it should not be ignored |
17:06 | make it tab 0 and visible | |
17:06 | but the visibility settings are further down | |
17:06 | the 4 checkboxes | |
17:07 | semarie | should I make bibioitems visible too ? (in 90.a) |
17:07 | cait | hm actually, leave ignore |
17:08 | but make it visible | |
17:08 | i just checkedin my installation and i also have ignore, but the checkboxes set for opac, editor and collapsed | |
17:08 | same settings for biblioitemnumber | |
17:09 | i mean tab = ignore seems to be correct, but updating the visibility is good | |
17:11 | Dyrcona joined #koha | |
17:11 | semarie | if ignored (and visible), I can't see it in marc view. with tab=0, I am seeing it as 90.9 |
17:11 | cait | 90.9? |
17:12 | semarie | biblionumber is 090.9 and biblioitems is 090.a |
17:12 | cait | yes |
17:12 | did the change on visibility help your problem in any way? | |
17:12 | semarie | no :) |
17:12 | cait | ook, i tdidn't hurt either :) |
17:13 | I tihnk the 001 might be hardcoded in the stanard unimarc xslt | |
17:13 | semarie | the xslt template is expecting the bibionumber to be somewhere else. |
17:13 | cait | while the old templates looked up the mappings |
17:13 | yeah | |
17:13 | i think you can either try to move to 001 | |
17:13 | or update the xslt files | |
17:13 | semarie | I had to go now. sorry about that |
17:13 | bbl | |
17:13 | cait | if you decide to move to 001... that's certainly more complicated |
17:13 | no problem | |
17:13 | good luck | |
17:18 | janPasi_ joined #koha | |
17:18 | lari joined #koha | |
17:18 | jajm joined #koha | |
17:18 | tuxayo joined #koha | |
17:18 | ashimema joined #koha | |
17:18 | Nemo_bis joined #koha | |
17:31 | janPasi_ joined #koha | |
17:31 | lari joined #koha | |
17:31 | jajm joined #koha | |
17:31 | tuxayo joined #koha | |
17:31 | ashimema joined #koha | |
17:31 | Nemo_bis joined #koha | |
18:26 | semarie | updating the xslt files is the simpler, but I will have to redo it at each update (and I am using debian package) |
18:26 | move to 001 is way more complex | |
18:27 | changing the currents notices is doable via scripting (without too much problem i think), but reconfiguring koha to use 001 instead of 090.9 is a bigger problem for me | |
18:28 | regarding biblioitems, should it be move to another field to ? I have it in 090.a currently | |
19:29 | cait | I think in Koha you need to change hte Koha to MARC mappings |
19:29 | and maybe have a look at your indexing | |
19:29 | and you for sure will have to reindex after | |
21:45 | janPasi_ joined #koha | |
21:45 | lari joined #koha | |
21:45 | jajm joined #koha | |
21:45 | tuxayo joined #koha | |
21:45 | ashimema joined #koha | |
21:45 | Nemo_bis joined #koha | |
22:02 | janPasi_ joined #koha | |
22:02 | lari joined #koha | |
22:02 | jajm joined #koha | |
22:02 | tuxayo joined #koha | |
22:02 | ashimema joined #koha | |
22:02 | Nemo_bis joined #koha | |
22:04 | janPasi_ joined #koha | |
22:04 | lari joined #koha | |
22:04 | jajm joined #koha | |
22:04 | tuxayo joined #koha | |
22:04 | ashimema joined #koha | |
22:04 | Nemo_bis joined #koha | |
22:54 | davidnind left #koha | |
23:02 | kellym joined #koha | |
23:43 | cait__ joined #koha |
← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index