← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index
All times shown according to UTC.
| Time | Nick | Message |
|---|---|---|
| 12:28 | ricardo | Hi all :) |
| 12:29 | slef: are you here? | |
| 12:40 | paul | hi ricardo. He was here 1 hour ago |
| 12:42 | nengard | paul - can you take a look at this http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/b[…]w_bug.cgi?id=1947 and just let us know if this preference is used? |
| 12:42 | paul | hi nengard |
| 12:42 | nengard | hiya |
| 12:45 | ricardo | . Thanks for the info! |
| 12:45 | paul | nengard: you're right. It seems unused now. |
| 12:46 | slef | ricardo: I'm here now. |
| 12:46 | http://www.ricmarques.net/ is Apache test page. Someone tell ricardo when he reappears. | |
| 12:47 | ricardo | slef: Well, it's NOT exactly THE Apache test page if you read it carefully :) |
| 12:47 | nengard | thanks paul |
| 12:48 | slef | "Apache 2 Test Page powered by CentOS"? |
| 12:50 | ricardo | slef: Hmmm... I may be bitten by the "Proxy-caching" bug here again. I refresh the page and I still get my old text "Página de teste de Virtual Host". But http://web-sniffer.net tellms me you're right. Probably due to an upgrade I did to CentOS 5.2. Thanks for the "heads up" |
| 12:50 | slef | np |
| 12:50 | ricardo | :) |
| 12:53 | slef | ricardo: did you want me for something before I restart work on http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/b[…]w_bug.cgi?id=2244 ? |
| 12:54 | ricardo | Yup... It seems to be the proxy caching. Even if I do Shift+Ctrl+R our Ctrl+F5 to reload the page, bypassing the browser cache, I still get the same text page |
| 12:54 | slef | I don't call them poxy-caches for nothing. |
| 12:55 | ricardo | slef: LOL, yeah |
| 12:55 | slef: Nope. That was it, thanks. I noticed your message in the IRC logs, and logged in to see what was this about | |
| 12:55 | s/our/or above (gee...) | |
| 13:00 | paul | nengard: could you confirm that a branch search works fine. |
| 13:00 | for me : | |
| 13:01 | "potter and branch=VID" direct search is OK | |
| 13:01 | but an adv search using kw (1st form entry) and limit to branch "VID" returns nothing | |
| 13:02 | mmm... I have a problem in CQL building... | |
| 13:02 | WARNING: query problem with kw,wrdl= potter and and and and and and and and and and and and and branch=VID | |
| 13:03 | nengard | okey dokey |
| 13:05 | ricardo | BRB |
| 14:55 | hdl_laptop | hello |
| 14:58 | paul | coucou hdl |
| 14:58 | coucou hdl_laptop | |
| 15:03 | gmcharlt | hi paul and hdl_laptop |
| 15:03 | paul | hello gmcharlt |
| 17:20 | nengard | question about authorized values - what is CCODE? |
| 17:21 | gmcharlt | nengard: collection cod |
| 17:21 | nengard | gmcharlt - where does it appear? when cataloging? or adding items? |
| 17:21 | or both? | |
| 17:22 | and what are the HINGS_* | |
| 17:24 | gmcharlt | editing items |
| 17:25 | HINGS = holdings coded value; HINGS_PF = holdings physical format (from 007), HINGS_RD = retention policy, etc. | |
| 17:28 | nengard | thanks gmcharlt - i have added some stuff to the bottom of this document: http://sites.google.com/a/libl[…]Authorized-Values |
| 17:28 | I'll try to beef it up | |
| 17:34 | hdl_laptop | nengard: LOC stands for location in libraries (dedicated space) |
| 17:34 | nengard | hdl_laptop - when do you see this pull down? when editing an item? or a record? |
| 17:35 | hdl_laptop | usually item. |
| 17:35 | But it all depends on your settings, if you want to use that. | |
| 17:35 | nengard | k |
| 17:35 | hdl_laptop | Is branch now part of the authorised values ??? |
| 17:36 | nengard | hdl_laptop - i don't see it on my install ... |
| 17:36 | hdl_laptop | hopefully. |
| 17:37 | Since there is a big difference between a branch and an authorised value management. | |
| 17:37 | But your manual seemed to speak about BRANCH management as an authorised_value | |
| 17:38 | nengard | oh yeah - that was written by someone else ... interesting .... |
| 17:38 | hang on | |
| 17:38 | okay - read up a bit - it's an example that we added to show how to add a value | |
| 17:38 | it's not a real value | |
| 17:39 | That's why i was adding a list of exisiting values | |
| 17:39 | so that people knew what came with the system | |
| 17:41 | hdl_laptop | May be confusing for readers... who will try to do strictly what is written on the handbook don't you think ? |
| 17:42 | imho, adding LANG or any harmless authorised value such ass SUGGEST could be a better example ;) | |
| 17:42 | nengard | k - i can re-write |
| 17:42 | this is why i sent the doc out to all - so i'd get some feedback | |
| 17:43 | hdl_laptop | I donot ask YOU to do, just making suggestion. |
| 17:43 | Hopefully, things like that will come out since you opened up your doc. | |
| 17:44 | And MANY MANY THX for that huge work you've already done. | |
| 17:45 | nengard | i don't mind fixing this one - i didn't write it so it's in a diff format than most of my pages - so re-writing will allow me ot edit it to match my style |
| 18:04 | okay this document is edited: http://sites.google.com/a/libl[…]Authorized-Values -- hit refresh - and feel free to tell me how to fill in the question marks :) | |
| 06:24 | chris | here comes the nightshift :) |
| 06:25 | masonj | hi chris |
| 06:25 | chris | hey mason |
| 10:00 | slef | damn the link is unstable today :( |
| 10:30 | frederic | hello |
| 10:30 | Is there a way to send directly a CCL query in OPAC? | |
| 10:31 | I would like to do a search on CCL index Date-of-acquisition |
← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index