← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index
All times shown according to UTC.
| Time | Nick | Message |
|---|---|---|
| 12:31 | owen | Hi #koha |
| 12:46 | kados | morning owen |
| 12:46 | owen: how was your weekend? | |
| 12:46 | owen | Fine, thanks. Back at home base now? |
| 12:48 | kados | hehe, I wish ... I'm in Miami this week |
| 12:48 | owen | FL? |
| 12:48 | kados | today I have 'off' which basically means I'll be cooped up in my hotel room programming |
| 12:48 | yea, Maimi FL | |
| 12:48 | got some meetings this week hereabout | |
| 12:49 | later in the week, MN, and then I'm back home on Sat for a while | |
| 12:49 | whew! | |
| 12:49 | owen | I was going to suggest taking your laptop to the beach, but Google says you've got rain today |
| 12:49 | kados | yea, weather's not the greatest |
| 12:49 | still kinda neat to be in FL though :-) | |
| 12:49 | it's fairly warm | |
| 12:50 | owen | I've got an interface idea to run by you |
| 12:50 | Should we disable the 'issue to' form field when the patron is restricted? | |
| 12:50 | kados | good question ... |
| 12:51 | yea, makes sense | |
| 12:51 | rather than just fail when they scan it | |
| 12:51 | owen | That's what I was thinking |
| 12:52 | For that matter, maybe the messages/warnings column expands to replace the issue column in the layout? | |
| 12:52 | ...Since you can really do anything until you take care of whatever is blocking the account? | |
| 12:53 | kados | yea, that also makes sense |
| 12:53 | owen | Okay, I'll experiment with that |
| 12:59 | kados | brb |
| 13:32 | hdl: you around? | |
| 13:33 | hdl: there's some code in the template like "TMPL_IF NAME="9523a" ... for sorting | |
| 13:33 | paul | hi kados |
| 13:35 | hdl | kados ? |
| 13:35 | kados | hi guys |
| 13:36 | <!--TMPL_IF Name="9523d"--> | |
| 13:36 | <option value="1=9523 <i" selected="selected">Popularity (Least to Most)</option> | |
| 13:36 | <!--TMPL_ELSE --> | |
| 13:36 | this code ... doesn't seem to work | |
| 13:36 | ie, it never shows up as selected | |
| 13:36 | I'm planning to fix that now | |
| 13:37 | paul | (kados : a quick question = how many liblimers are there today ? 10 ? 12 ? ) |
| 13:37 | kados | hdl: I just want to confirm it's not working for you, right? |
| 13:38 | paul: 12 full-timers I think | |
| 13:38 | paul | (it's for a press release to announce birth of BibLibre. I want to say that we are 3 in France, and you are already 12 on your side, all of us being equally involved in Koha) |
| 13:38 | kados | cool |
| 13:39 | hdl | OK. |
| 13:40 | This seems to disable 9523 when 9523 is not defined in bib1.att | |
| 13:42 | kados | really? |
| 13:42 | disable, as in it doesn't show up? | |
| 13:52 | hdl: also, it seems that my distinction between koha query, machine-readable query, and searchdesc have been muddied | |
| 13:52 | I'll also be fixing that today | |
| 13:58 | hdl | kados : this distinction was not clearly used in templates. |
| 13:59 | I did my best to keep things working. | |
| 14:00 | But I also think that having "human readable" search description is both important but not so easy to get. | |
| 14:04 | kados | I'll do my best to get this working |
| 14:04 | I've also resurected facets | |
| 14:04 | paul | kados ++ |
| 14:05 | kados | http://staff-jmf.dev.kohalibra[…]e/search.pl?q=the |
| 14:05 | resort working | |
| 14:05 | facets almost working | |
| 14:06 | one thing I could use advice on | |
| 14:06 | paul | kados : shouldn't we remove the numbers in the facets ? |
| 14:06 | kados | in the advsearch.tmpl there is a section for 'TMPL_IF NAME=UNIMARC' |
| 14:06 | that has some french language strings | |
| 14:06 | I think the translator will be confused | |
| 14:07 | paul: perhaps, yes | |
| 14:07 | paul | because our libraries are VERY confused to see "branch (3)" and, when clicking, getting 10, 100 or even 1000 results ! |
| 14:07 | kados | paul: although we may be able to get the facets from zebra, with a valid count from teh result set |
| 14:07 | paul: I am investigating this still | |
| 14:07 | paul | yep, I remember you asked indexdata about the cost |
| 14:07 | kados | *nod* |
| 14:07 | hdl | kados : have you seen my email ? and how I did this ? |
| 14:07 | kados | it's $15,000 if I don't mind ... but I think i can do it with scan-> |
| 14:08 | hdl: no, I must have missed it | |
| 14:08 | did you figure out a way? | |
| 14:08 | hdl | scan will give you only the 10 first results |
| 14:08 | no matter their weight. | |
| 14:08 | kados | ahh |
| 14:08 | hdl | And this really is a pain in the neck. |
| 14:08 | kados | yep |
| 14:09 | hdl | unless you know a way to ask for the most relevant search results pqf ? |
| 14:09 | kados | I don't know, I haven't gotten to examining it yet, just had an idea while showering :-) |
| 14:09 | I will take a look today | |
| 14:10 | hdl | resort didn't work ? |
| 14:10 | kados | but if you have an idea for the UNIMARC issues |
| 14:10 | hdl: resort should work now | |
| 14:10 | hdl | Is it pushed ? |
| 14:10 | kados | not yet |
| 14:10 | http://staff-jmf.dev.kohalibra[…]sort_by=author_az | |
| 14:10 | http://staff-jmf.dev.kohalibra[…]sort_by=author_za | |
| 14:10 | seems to work well | |
| 14:11 | er? now it's not working ... | |
| 14:11 | hdl | are you not using 1=2 >i |
| 14:12 | in sort_by parameters ? | |
| 14:12 | kados | ahh, yes, it's working |
| 14:12 | hdl: yes, but I do it in Search.pm now | |
| 14:12 | hdl: it's too hard to remember the numbers :-) | |
| 14:12 | hdl: so we have string value that maps to the numbers in search.pm | |
| 14:13 | I think I will need to updateNoZebra too | |
| 14:13 | paul: hdl did you know changelanguage doesn't work on the staff client? | |
| 14:13 | (look for English / Fransais at bottom of page) | |
| 14:13 | hdl | In koha 22 it was the case. |
| 14:13 | kados | it sets the cookie, but the staff client ignores the cookie for some reason |
| 14:14 | it should be a simple fix, no? | |
| 14:14 | paul | no, I didn't knew that. all our libraries just need french (on staff) ;-) |
| 14:14 | kados | hehe |
| 14:14 | paul | probably. |
| 14:14 | hdl | anyway, hopefully, staff will not change languages too often. |
| 14:15 | kados | so what shall I do about the TMPL_IF NAME=UNIMARC in the template? |
| 14:15 | the advsearch.tmpl ? | |
| 14:16 | hdl | paul ? |
| 14:17 | paul | the best solution would be to have those strings in english in the template |
| 14:17 | and let the translator handle the french version. | |
| 14:17 | but I couldn't find time to do that | |
| 14:17 | hdl | This should also be the case for all UNIMARC plugins. |
| 14:17 | paul | yep |
| 14:18 | hdl | I can do this for advsearch.tmpl |
| 14:18 | kados | could it make sense to have a separate template for advsearch for UNIMARC? |
| 14:18 | hdl | Question is : will it work fine for all the zebra and nonzebra installations ?? |
| 14:18 | paul | kados: I don't think so |
| 14:19 | (because unimarc english could be interesting) | |
| 14:19 | kados | right |
| 14:19 | and in fact, that's something else we need to discuss re: installer | |
| 14:19 | paul | right ! |
| 14:19 | hdl | We could do TMPL_INCLUDE ? |
| 14:19 | kados | I have UNIMARC english frameworks that I wnt to include |
| 14:19 | in 3.0 | |
| 14:19 | hdl: ahh, good idea | |
| 14:19 | hdl: I'll do it as an include | |
| 14:20 | for now, and you can translate it when you have time | |
| 14:22 | next question ... how does TMPL_IF NAME=UNIMARC even get set? | |
| 14:23 | paul | (but would be VERY easy to introduce) |
| 14:24 | kados | ok, that's done |
| 14:24 | hdl: so w/respect to the installer | |
| 14:25 | hdl: do you have an idea for how to allow a UNIMARC/MARC21/XXMARC choice? | |
| 14:25 | because I have some english UNIMARC frameworks I'd really like to include | |
| 14:25 | (and it means I can test in UNIMARC too ;-)) | |
| 14:25 | paul | kados : in french, we have divided directories differently than you |
| 14:26 | kados | ahh, really ... can you explain? |
| 14:26 | paul | it's not mandatory/ optionnal / ??? |
| 14:26 | it's mandatory / public library / research library | |
| 14:26 | kados | interesting |
| 14:26 | paul | of course, someone could clic on unconsistent values in PL & RL, but that would look idiot to anyone. |
| 14:27 | so, you could have "mandatory / unimarc / usmarc" in english | |
| 14:27 | hdl | Nope. |
| 14:27 | kados | I think frameworks are mandatory ... |
| 14:27 | paul | and explain "if you choose something in unimarc, then forget usmarc" |
| 14:27 | kados | and it's a global setting right now |
| 14:27 | hdl | Because one marcflavour is mandatory. |
| 14:27 | kados | hdl: right |
| 14:27 | we need the user to choose | |
| 14:28 | what if we had: | |
| 14:28 | data/en/frameworks | |
| 14:28 | data/en/mandatory | |
| 14:28 | data/en/etc | |
| 14:28 | and in frameworks we had two types: | |
| 14:28 | marc21_ | |
| 14:28 | unimarc_ | |
| 14:28 | and the user only sees the type he has picked | |
| 14:28 | ? | |
| 14:29 | paul | it would be harder to add XXXmarc or marcYYY |
| 14:30 | kados | true |
| 14:30 | maybe a directory then? | |
| 14:30 | installer/data/en/marc21/ | |
| 14:30 | installer/data/en/unimarc/ | |
| 14:30 | hdl | no. |
| 14:31 | kados | what then? :-) |
| 14:31 | hdl | frameworks should be separated from other data. |
| 14:31 | installer/data/en/frameworks/marc21/ | |
| 14:31 | kados | ok |
| 14:31 | I can live with that :-) | |
| 14:32 | hdl | then the user should have radio button for framework choice. |
| 14:32 | kados | hdl: will it be hard to add that to the installer? |
| 14:33 | hdl | Not so hard. |
| 14:33 | But i must find the right place. | |
| 14:34 | because one should do framework choice before all the sql values are loaded. | |
| 14:34 | kados | right |
| 14:34 | hdl++ | |
| 14:40 | paul | kados : i have a question about "default searchon kw-wrdl |
| 14:40 | you have reverted my 2nd patch, but not the 1st one. | |
| 14:40 | now, a lot of search features don't work anymore. | |
| 14:41 | but if we revert my 1st patch, the search forms on top won't do kw,wrdl search and truncations don't work | |
| 14:41 | so, we have a problem ;-) | |
| 14:41 | and I don't know how to solve it ! | |
| 14:42 | kados | hmmm |
| 14:42 | first, the default search shoudl be "", not kw,wrdl | |
| 14:42 | I've fixed that, but not pushed up yet | |
| 14:43 | do you expect to do truncation with every query? | |
| 14:43 | paul | nope, only if the user enter truncation wildcard |
| 14:43 | but hdl did it only on wrdl, which is logic I think | |
| 14:43 | kados | what is the truncation wildcard? |
| 14:43 | paul | * |
| 14:43 | kados | ok, I will need to test this |
| 14:44 | paul | potte* will find potter & pottery |
| 14:44 | *tter will find potter & hatter | |
| 14:44 | ??? | |
| 14:44 | kados | http://staff-jmf.dev.kohalibra[…]?q=testing+biblio |
| 14:44 | testing biblio finds test biblio | |
| 14:45 | I see truncation isnt' working on mine | |
| 14:45 | I'll test | |
| 14:45 | paul | I confirm it doesn't work |
| 14:46 | http://i11.bureau.paulpoulain.[…]ort_by=&do=Search | |
| 14:46 | find egyptien & egyptologie as expected | |
| 14:47 | kados : adv search "default" search is on keyword, kw,wrdl. don't you expect the top forms to be the same ? our libraries really think it is. | |
| 14:49 | (on this link, click on page 2, and you 'll see the bug introduced by the 1st commit patched by the 2nd one you've reverted) | |
| 14:53 | rh | should the "z3950servers" table be populated or does it get populated on the fly when you do a search? |
| 14:54 | hdl | rh : it should be populated. |
| 14:54 | rh | okay mine is empty.. does that mean i screwed something up during install? |
| 14:54 | hdl | (it is up to the librarian to know from which sources he wants to get biblios) |
| 14:55 | rh | ah |
| 14:55 | oh so that is something that I need to add manually | |
| 14:59 | oh i see there is a handy form in the gui | |
| 15:16 | kados | hdl: so you have: |
| 15:16 | if (index($index,"phr")<0 && index($index,",")>0){ | |
| 15:16 | # if the operator contains more than one qualifier, but not phrase | |
| 15:16 | that's when you apply truncation? | |
| 15:16 | paul: is that right? | |
| 15:16 | hdl | yes. |
| 15:17 | maybe we could apply also when no qualifier defined. | |
| 15:17 | But would be a problem | |
| 15:17 | kados | why not just turn on the right-truncation for every query? |
| 15:18 | hdl | because one could enter ccl=ti=atata and au,phr=zzmzm |
| 15:18 | No. | |
| 15:18 | This is not what our users expect (in Intranet) | |
| 15:18 | kados | what I mean is, add the right-truncation qualifier to every query |
| 15:18 | not add * to every query | |
| 15:19 | it does nothing if you don't have * defined, right? | |
| 15:19 | hdl | I understood what you said. |
| 15:19 | kados | (the other way to acomplish this right-truncation is with regex ... it might be the better way) |
| 15:19 | hdl | But librarians donot expect truncation to happen on any query. |
| 15:20 | (regex seems to be time consuming on zebra) | |
| 15:20 | kados | (ok) |
| 15:20 | hmmm | |
| 15:21 | hdl | And my opinion is that what i did provide users with great fexibility. |
| 15:22 | and allow them both truncated and non truncated search. | |
| 15:22 | kados | yep, I agree |
| 15:22 | but it breaks the field weighting, stemming and fuzzy stuff | |
| 15:22 | so I'm looking at how to make it work | |
| 15:23 | one issue is that the variables change hands so often I'm not sure where the right ones are :-) | |
| 15:24 | so you split the $operand into a @wordlist | |
| 15:24 | but that will certainly break multi-leaf queries | |
| 15:24 | what if the $operand itself is a full query? | |
| 15:24 | hdl | Can you explain field weighting? in some details ? |
| 15:25 | kados | field weighting ranks results according to where they are found and how ... so if an exact title, it gets a high score, if an exact author, less high score, etc. |
| 15:27 | hdl: for instance: | |
| 15:27 | http://staff-jmf.dev.kohalibra[…]e/search.pl?q=the | |
| 15:27 | hdl: without field weighting, exact title 'the' would not be the first result | |
| 15:28 | hdl: these two features are compatible with each other | |
| 15:28 | hdl: with some minor changes ... I'm working on it now | |
| 15:29 | hdl | how is it calculated ? |
| 15:29 | kados | it's done with the r1,r2,r3 stuff ... a query is parsed and turned into a multi-leaf query |
| 15:29 | rk = ( | |
| 15:29 | some stuff | |
| 15:29 | ) | |
| 15:30 | hdl | kados : if $operand itself is a full query |
| 15:30 | then index should be null. | |
| 15:31 | kados | nope, not according to CCL syntax |
| 15:31 | dev_week supports hiararchical nesting of queries | |
| 15:31 | hdl | can you give user examples ? |
| 15:31 | kados | so a whole query can be an operand and there can be an operator and qualifiers on it |
| 15:31 | facets are a good example | |
| 15:32 | hdl | but facets are calculated and not user based. |
| 15:33 | kados | ok, I found this example: |
| 15:33 | if (scalar(@righttruncated)+scalar(@lefttruncated)+scalar(@rightlefttruncated)>0){ | |
| 15:33 | s/example/code/ | |
| 15:33 | $query.= "$index: @nontruncated " if (scalar(@nontruncated)>0); | |
| 15:33 | how is @nontruncated evaluated there, as a scalar or an array? | |
| 15:34 | hdl | (One thing that strikes me is that facet order is never the same.) |
| 15:34 | array | |
| 15:34 | index is assumed to be wordlist. | |
| 15:34 | and puts the words behind. | |
| 15:35 | index : | |
| 15:35 | au,wrdl: Hugo Victor | |
| 15:35 | print @list | |
| 15:35 | kados | au,wrdl: Hugo* Victor* ? |
| 15:35 | hdl | will print "$list[0] $list[1]" |
| 15:36 | no. | |
| 15:36 | kados | or do you use ? |
| 15:36 | instead of * | |
| 15:36 | hdl | I use rtrn, ltrn and lrtrn zebra attributes. |
| 15:37 | @nontruncated is for non truncated words. | |
| 15:37 | @righttruncated is for right truncated words (Vic*) | |
| 15:37 | @lefttruncated left truncated words (*tor) | |
| 15:38 | I remove any * | |
| 15:38 | and adds the good qualifier to indexes. | |
| 15:38 | ltrn | |
| 15:38 | rtrn | |
| 15:38 | lrtrn | |
| 15:38 | I didnot process real regular expressions. | |
| 15:39 | I considered then that librarian would know how to write a ccl expression. | |
| 15:40 | ccl=au,regexp-1=Ba[c|h]+ | |
| 15:40 | kados | right |
| 15:40 | in fact, this works well for non-field-weighted queries: | |
| 15:40 | http://staff-jmf.dev.kohalibra[…]search.pl?q=libl* | |
| 15:41 | well, almost: | |
| 15:41 | http://staff-jmf.dev.kohalibra[…]search.pl?q=*lime | |
| 15:41 | :( | |
| 15:42 | better: | |
| 15:42 | http://staff-jmf.dev.kohalibra[…]search.pl?q=*lime | |
| 15:42 | hdl | you should have then q=kw,wrdl,rtrn=libl |
| 15:42 | kados | @attrset Bib-1 @attr 5=2 lime |
| 15:43 | addinfo: "Both left - and right truncation not supported | |
| 15:43 | zebra it seems can't do both left and right truncation | |
| 15:43 | maybe you have a newer version? | |
| 15:44 | hdl | 2.0.18 |
| 15:45 | kados | 2.0.14 |
| 15:45 | hdl | But I think that you have tright truncation activated by default. |
| 15:45 | I donot. | |
| 15:46 | kados | hmmm, I don't think I do |
| 15:46 | nope | |
| 15:46 | well, if you enable field-weighting AND stemming | |
| 15:46 | hdl | ltrn and rtrn are exclusives. |
| 15:46 | kados | the stemmed operand will be right-truncated |
| 15:48 | hdl: I think with field-weighting off, your code is preserved | |
| 15:48 | hdl: on my installation | |
| 15:48 | (currently it's turned off, so you can test if I'm right) | |
| 15:49 | but with field weighting turned off: | |
| 15:49 | http://staff-jmf.dev.kohalibra[…]o+be+or+not+to+be | |
| 15:49 | failes | |
| 15:49 | :-) | |
| 15:49 | we need a query parser :/ | |
| 15:50 | hdl | Is this a zebra error a ccl error ? |
| 15:51 | kados | it's an unbalanced query |
| 15:51 | to be OR NOT to be | |
| 15:51 | if you send it directly to zebra it will fail of course | |
| 15:53 | hdl | results of scan indexes are unwelcoming. |
| 15:54 | Do you use stemming or fieldweighting for to be or not to be ? | |
| 15:54 | kados | if I enable field weighting, it works |
| 15:55 | I can show you, just a sec | |
| 15:55 | owen: bug 1520 is a frameworks thing | |
| 15:55 | owen: those fields are there, they're probably just set to 'hidden' | |
| 15:55 | owen | Okay, cool. |
| 15:55 | kados | owen: check the MARC framework in 952 to see if I'm right |
| 15:55 | hdl: http://staff-jmf.dev.kohalibra[…]o+be+or+not+to+be | |
| 15:58 | huh, wonder why the itemtype icons don't display for those results | |
| 16:05 | hdl | itemtype icons havenot been displayed for the whole day. |
| 16:05 | what does zebra query look like ? | |
| 16:06 | kados | I'm going to have to dig deeper, some things are failing here |
| 16:06 | hdl: I'll let you work on installer, I'll fix the searching :-) | |
| 16:07 | paul | kados : just to let you know : http://www.biblibre.com/ launched this morning |
| 16:07 | MUCH less appealing that www.liblime.com ;-) | |
| 16:08 | but hopefullty efficient & easy to use for future customers. | |
| 16:08 | (+ french librarians won't probably enjoy some of the typically US enthusiasm that are on www.biblibre.com) | |
| 16:09 | (for example, the guy on the main page that seem to fly due to the speed of koha zoom would probably be very unliked by most librarians) | |
| 16:09 | kados | paul, hdl: congrats! |
| 16:10 | paul | (picture probably considered as not "serious as a librarian should be" :-D ) |
| 16:10 | kados | looks nice, paul |
| 16:10 | (french librarins are different than 'wild' US ones I guess ;-)) | |
| 16:11 | paul | liblime = "jeu de mot". bibLibre = jeu de mot as well. means "freelibrary". the left page of the book logo being also a bird with the yellow L |
| 16:11 | book = library / bird = freeness | |
| 16:11 | (pictures @ me, from the SAN-OP library ;-) ) | |
| 16:13 | kados | cool |
| 16:17 | paul | kados / hdl : i've reverted the 1st part of the kw,wrdl search reverted. no more problems, except the one that we had before : |
| 16:18 | http://o11.bureau.paulpoulain.[…]koha/opac-main.pl | |
| 16:18 | kados | paul: do a search on 'to be or not to be' |
| 16:18 | paul | search "egyp*" on main search => 10 results |
| 16:18 | http://o11.bureau.paulpoulain.[…]ha/opac-search.pl | |
| 16:18 | kados | paul: yep, the problem is, the revert means your stuff works, but mine doesn't :-=) |
| 16:19 | paul: I'm working on a solution for all features to work :-) | |
| 16:19 | paul: so hang tight :-) | |
| 16:19 | paul | ok, so I let you the ball ;-) |
| 16:19 | kados | :) |
| 16:20 | hehe | |
| 16:20 | on your installation? | |
| 16:20 | or on mine? | |
| 16:20 | paul | on your |
| 16:20 | kados | ahh, on mine :-) |
| 16:20 | hehe | |
| 16:20 | funny book title | |
| 16:23 | hdl | I recveived some information from Mike Taylor. |
| 16:24 | And facets could certainly result from scans operations. | |
| 16:27 | But there is still the problem of relevancy sorting. | |
| 16:31 | kados | I'll look at that later today |
| 16:49 | [K] | *** join #koha FreeNode: darcilicious i=plinkit 159.121.122.56 |
| 17:14 | gmcharlt | hi paul |
| 17:14 | paul | hi gmcharlt |
| 17:14 | gmcharlt | translation question for you |
| 17:14 | paul | (it's almost time to leave for me, just in case you have a long question :-) ) |
| 17:14 | gmcharlt | short, hopefully |
| 17:14 | working on a template that includes a record status | |
| 17:15 | is there a way in the TMPL code to say use a particular translation table | |
| 17:15 | rather than a bunch of TMPL_IFs | |
| 17:15 | paul | not sure to understand your question. |
| 17:16 | gmcharlt | OK, let's say the record status field has three values 1, 2, 3 |
| 17:16 | which correspond to English display "good", "bad", and "ugly" | |
| 17:16 | is there an easy way to say | |
| 17:16 | when mapping such a status to display values | |
| 17:16 | paul | don't you use authorised_values ? |
| 17:16 | gmcharlt | "please use this external table of mappings from my coded values to strings" |
| 17:17 | could, I suppose, but for the field in question (which is a non-MARC field), user cannot and should not edit the lists of statuses | |
| 17:17 | except for the display lables, I suppose | |
| 17:18 | paul | I don't think there is a simple solution to this question. At least, I don't see one |
| 17:19 | gmcharlt | OK. I'll keep it in mind -- maybe at some point it would be worth the effort to create such a solution to aid translating some parts of the interface |
| 17:20 | thanks, paul | |
| 17:20 | paul | your welcome |
| 17:57 | fbcit | kados:hi |
| 17:57 | kados | hiya fbcit |
| 17:57 | fbcit | kados: I'm back to the point where I need MARC::File::XML & XML::RSS, however... |
| 17:58 | apt seems to have issues connecting to the berkeley server | |
| 17:58 | although I can browse to it... | |
| 17:59 | kados | hmmm, your outbount port 80 isn't being proxied on your server, is it? |
| 17:59 | fbcit | so apt will not install libxml-rss-perl |
| 17:59 | no I permit all outbound traffic from this ip across the firewall. | |
| 17:59 | kados | hmmm, very strange |
| 18:00 | try apt-get update | |
| 18:00 | fbcit | that blows chunks too. |
| 18:00 | I was able to apt install libxml-libxml-perl... | |
| 18:01 | Failed to fetch http://linux.csua.berkeley.edu[…]/etch/Release.gpg Could not connect to linux.csua.berkeley.edu:80 (169.229.49.36). - connect (101 Network is unreachable) | |
| 18:01 | etc.. | |
| 18:01 | kados | hmmm |
| 18:01 | fbcit | apt does fine with ftp.indexdata.dk |
| 18:01 | kados | sounds like that target is down |
| 18:02 | I'd find another apt source | |
| 18:02 | I think ftp.debian.org is one | |
| 18:02 | fbcit | I figured it might be down to although I can browse through the dir structure w/firefox. |
| 18:03 | I'll add debian.org... | |
| 19:31 | hdl | kados : patch on your way. |
| 19:38 | kados | hdl: thanks |
| 19:56 | fbcit | kados: I went ahead with a reinstall via CPAN of MARC::File::XML. It fails on 'make test'... |
| 21:12 | chris | hdl: you still about? |
| 21:13 | can you tar amd gzip your patch and send again, the utf8 characters got killed by the mailer | |
| 21:32 | mj | is there any place where I can download koha 3.0 beta's? |
| 21:33 | kados | mj: yes, but wait about 10 minutes, it's broken at the moment ;-) |
| 21:33 | mj | ok :) |
| 21:33 | because at the homepage I only see 2.2.x downloads | |
| 21:35 | kados | mj: yep |
| 21:47 | hdl | chris : on your way |
| 21:47 | (patch coming) | |
| 22:00 | [K] | <darcilicious FreeNode> chris! congratulations! :) |
| 22:13 | chris | thanks :) |
| 09:32 | hdl_away | new install updates marcflavour on selection. |
| 09:33 | hdl | So if you donot want to display an error on marcflavour insert when adding systempreferences, consider removing i from systempreferences if you have a marcflavour directory. |
| 09:34 | ERROR 1146 (42S02) at line 23: Table 'BSG.class_sort_rules' doesn't exist | |
| 09:34 | Other problem : class_sources. | |
| 10:32 | kados | hi hdl |
| 10:32 | hdl: I believe I removed the line from sysprefs.sql in the end dir | |
| 10:32 | hdl | hi kados : already up ? |
| 10:32 | kados | hdl: where do you get that error with class_sources? |
| 10:32 | yes, early day today :-) | |
| 10:33 | hdl | I tried to complete the installation. |
| 10:33 | kados | hdl: did you get a chance to try the searching yet after updating? |
| 10:33 | hdl | I had this on third step |
| 10:33 | not yet. | |
| 10:33 | kados | hmmm |
| 10:33 | owen also had trouble last night | |
| 10:34 | hdl | Can't call method "param" on an undefined value at /home/hdl/Koha/Code/koha_dev/catalogue/search.pl line 190. |
| 10:34 | ||
| 10:34 | kados | 3.00.00.012 is when class_sort_rules are created |
| 10:34 | hdl | when searching particu* |
| 10:35 | I had the previous message | |
| 10:35 | kados | if (C4::Context->preference("marcflavour") eq "UNIMARC" ) { |
| 10:35 | $template->param('UNIMARC' => 1); | |
| 10:35 | } | |
| 10:35 | that's line 190 | |
| 10:35 | it should be moved down | |
| 10:35 | about 8 lines or so | |
| 10:35 | sorry ... | |
| 10:36 | it needs to go after get_template_and_user | |
| 10:36 | (if I had a unimarc install I would have caught this :-)) | |
| 10:37 | hdl: working now? | |
| 10:37 | hdl | yes. |
| 10:37 | kados | great! |
| 10:37 | can you try something like : | |
| 10:37 | *someword* | |
| 10:38 | does right and left truncation work with zebra 2.0.18? | |
| 10:38 | hdl | su,wrdl:,rtrn:particu |
| 10:38 | kados | hmmm, that doesn't look right |
| 10:38 | hdl | Donot work for subjects. |
| 10:39 | you should concatenate before : | |
| 10:39 | kados | right |
| 10:40 | hdl | yes rightand left truncation work on zebra 2.0.18 |
| 10:40 | kados | how did you test this with subjects, from advsearch? |
| 10:40 | hdl | yes. |
| 10:40 | I chose Subject entry in advsearch | |
| 10:41 | rltrn not working. | |
| 10:43 | kados | I see the bug with :, |
| 10:43 | line 758 | |
| 10:45 | ok, the index-based searches need work | |
| 10:45 | I see a couple bugs there | |
| 10:45 | I will work on this today | |
| 10:46 | hmmm, and my fixes to sorting were also removed :/ | |
| 10:48 | ahh, no, those are already fixed | |
| 10:48 | I was trying on a wrong demo :-) | |
| 10:50 | hdl: let me know if you find additional bugs | |
| 10:50 | hdl: I will try to fix them asap | |
| 10:51 | hdl | OK. |
| 10:51 | Will do some testing. | |
| 10:52 | kados | hdl++ |
← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index