All times shown according to UTC.
| Time | Nick | Message |
|---|---|---|
| 11:20 | hdl | kados around ? |
| 11:34 | kados | hdl: am now |
| 11:34 | hdl: what's up? | |
| 11:36 | paul | hello kados. |
| 11:46 | kados | hi paul |
| 11:47 | hdl | hi kados |
| 11:51 | For instance, if we ask for Title, Phrase (UNIMARC 200$a) Lord Of the Ring and Title (assuming Volume is indexed by Title, in UNIMARC200$v) 2 , | |
| 11:51 | Will we get The two towers ? | |
| 11:53 | would it be useful to get a Part-Title Identifier in record.abs ยง? | |
| 11:54 | kados | not sure I understand |
| 11:54 | hdl | Say we have |
| 11:54 | in the catalogue : | |
| 11:55 | 200$aThe Lord Of The Ring$v2$eThe Two Towers | |
| 11:55 | If we query : Title, Phrase (UNIMARC 200$a) Lord Of the Ring and Title (assuming Volume is indexed by Title, in UNIMARC200$v) 2 , | |
| 11:56 | wil we get that biblio ? | |
| 11:56 | kados | yep |
| 11:57 | as long as you're not doing a cross-subfield phrase search like "Lord of the ring 2" | |
| 11:58 | hdl | I tried to setup a wiki page on which we can input all the identifier we use in search and describe them and tell which record it is related to. |
| 11:58 | Maybe it is not usefull. | |
| 11:59 | But I think it is, since we could then tell other Koha devs which query you can setup to query for this or that piece of information. | |
| 12:00 | Without being too MARC-dependent. | |
| 12:01 | kados | but ... that's already done I think |
| 12:01 | ccl.properties has extensive documentation | |
| 12:02 | it shouldn't be MARC dependent | |
| 12:23 | hdl | But your advsearch is VERY MARC-dependent |
| 12:24 | kados | nope, only record.abs is |
| 12:34 | hdl | Are you telling me that all the limit subtype you give are not MARC-dependant ? |
| 12:35 | Braille and DVD record and so on ? | |
| 12:57 | toins | bye all |
| 13:10 | kados | the distinctions aren't MARC-dependent .. where they are made (record.abs) is |
| 13:24 | hdl | kados : but codes such as : mc-rtype:i or mc:t are MARC-dependent are they not ? |
| 13:30 | kados | nope |
| 13:30 | ahh ... yes, those are | |
| 13:30 | but they should be translated | |
| 13:31 | I haven't gotten around to it yet | |
| 13:32 | instead of mc-rtype:i, the user-facing query should be something like 'type:children's books' or something | |
| 13:32 | then the back-end translates it into cm-rtype:i in USMARC, and whatever in UNIMARC |