Today | Next day → | Search | Index
All times shown according to UTC.
| Time | Nick | Message |
|---|---|---|
| 21:04 | rach | kados, clicking on the items coming up on that page gets me a 404 - The requested URL /cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl was not found on this server. |
| 21:06 | kados | rach: yea, looks like owen hard-coded those links ... |
| 21:06 | to the old location | |
| 21:09 | hmmmm | |
| 21:11 | rach | yep dns looked like the prob to me |
| 21:40 | kados | finally fixed :-) |
| 21:41 | damn cisco routers | |
| 22:01 | rach | you get that |
| 02:56 | thd | good morning btoumi |
| 04:23 | hdl: do you know ENSSIB? | |
| 04:23 | hdl | Quite ? |
| 04:24 | quite. Why ? | |
| 04:24 | thd | hdl: are they using Koha? |
| 04:24 | paul_ | hello world. |
| 04:24 | thd | hello Paul_ |
| 04:24 | paul_ | enssib is using koha as 1 of the 2 ils they show to their students ;-) |
| 04:25 | paul | (the other one being their internal ils, don't remember it's name atm) |
| 04:26 | thd | paul: In their standard catalogue they have records which have both MARC 21 008 field but no UNIMARC 100, the rest as UNIMARC and all encoded in MARC-8 |
| 04:27 | hdl: do you remember what software they use for their standard catalogue? | |
| 04:29 | hdl | No. |
| 04:29 | thd | paul, hdl: do you know of any other libraries with amalgamated record formats? |
| 05:03 | paul: maybe they are using BiblioMondo PortFolio software but I see nothing on the BiblioMondo website or elsewhere describing amalgamated record syntax support. Only independent record syntax support | |
| 08:01 | kados | hi everyone |
| 08:02 | paul | hi kados. |
| 08:02 | was the week end fine ? | |
| 08:02 | (and did NPL goes live this morning ?) | |
| 08:02 | kados | very very busy :-) |
| 08:02 | yes, NPL is live | |
| 08:02 | http://search.athenscounty.lib.oh.us/ | |
| 08:03 | the OPAC layout still has some problems in some browsers | |
| 08:04 | paul | few quick questions... |
| 08:04 | kados | sure |
| 08:04 | paul | * how do you achieve "popularity" ordering ? |
| 08:04 | * the limit type to: is not related to itemtypes afaik. couldn't it be ? | |
| 08:04 | toins | hi kados |
| 08:04 | kados | popularity is 'how many times something was checked out' |
| 08:05 | items.issued has the count | |
| 08:05 | (even in Koha 1.2) | |
| 08:05 | limit type can be anything | |
| 08:05 | for NPL it's itemtype at the moment | |
| 08:05 | paul | it's the untranslatable problem we have spoken of isn't it ? |
| 08:05 | (the hash of hash...) | |
| 08:06 | kados | but I prefer to use the MARC fixed fields |
| 08:06 | it's part of the untranslatable problem ;-) | |
| 08:06 | but I think tumer has solved it at least partly | |
| 08:06 | in head | |
| 08:07 | paul | I hope to have something working correctly for unimarc at the end of this week |
| 08:07 | kados | excellent! |
| 08:07 | paul | (I don't mean a fully stable rel_3_0 of course ;-) ) |
| 08:07 | kados | :-) |
| 08:07 | paul | however, I think we will discard the CCODE hack & speak of it later on koha-devel. |
| 08:08 | (so, even with a stable rel_3_0 you could not install it at NPL i'm afraid) | |
| 08:08 | kados | (why not?) |
| 08:08 | ahh | |
| 08:09 | it shouldn't break anything | |
| 08:09 | later this month I will need to get item-level circ rules working for another client | |
| 08:09 | paul | maybe we could reintegrate it if you explain how it works. because for instance SAN-OP sees circulation broken. |
| 08:09 | kados | broken? |
| 08:09 | paul | seems no circ is possible |
| 08:09 | kados | circ is definitely not broken ;-) |
| 08:10 | otherwise, how could NPL go live? :-) | |
| 08:10 | CCODE has nothing to do with circulation | |
| 08:10 | it's just an authorized value | |
| 08:10 | paul | we speak of rel_3_0 here, and not of dev_week. Maybe toins missed something in branch synch |
| 08:10 | that is used for what ? | |
| 08:10 | (I thought it was related to circ rules) | |
| 08:11 | kados | ok, I will explain briefly but then I must head to a meeting |
| 08:11 | paul | ok, great |
| 08:11 | kados | originally NPL had many many itemtypes ... like 39 or so |
| 08:11 | but really, those were just 'collections' ... most had the same circ rules | |
| 08:12 | so for this upgrade, we created CCODE to store the old itemtypes | |
| 08:12 | and now they only have 4 itemtypes | |
| 08:12 | which are actually related to circ fules | |
| 08:12 | rules even | |
| 08:12 | so we just moved biblioitems.itemtype into biblioitems.ccode and created new biblioitems.itemtype values | |
| 08:13 | make sense? | |
| 08:13 | paul | yep. |
| 08:13 | so CCODE should not affect circ in any sense ? | |
| 08:13 | kados | correct |
| 08:13 | I haven't modified any circ code | |
| 08:13 | paul | strange... because it seems circ is broken in rel_3_0. I'll investigate, thanks |
| 08:14 | kados | ok, now I must head to NPL meeting :-) |
| 08:14 | cheers all | |
| 08:14 | paul | bye & read you later |
| 10:09 | hdl | tumer around ? |
| 10:10 | dewey : seen tumer ? | |
| 10:10 | dewey | tumer was last seen on #koha 3 days, 22 hours, 17 minutes and 1 seconds ago, saying: k [Fri Oct 6 04:53:14 2006] |
| 10:10 | hdl | thx |
| 10:10 | paul | pour une fois que tumer sert à quelque chose ;-) |
| 10:11 | s/tumer/dewey/ | |
| 10:11 | toins | dewey, seen toins ? |
| 10:11 | dewey | toins was last seen on #koha 0 seconds ago, saying: dewey, seen toins ? [Tue Oct 10 03:11:25 2006] |
| 10:50 | hdl | hi tumer |
| 10:50 | dewey | it has been said that hi tumer is still strugling |
| 10:50 | tumer[A] | hi hdl |
| 10:50 | hdl | how are you ? |
| 10:50 | tumer | very busy |
| 10:51 | hdl | Are you still using the same field/subfield for authtype, linkid and authid ? |
| 10:51 | tumer | doing trials with SMS messaging |
| 10:51 | hdl | Is it successful ? |
| 10:51 | tumer | hdl:for authorities yes |
| 10:52 | hdl | I thought you suggested 001 for authid didnot you ? |
| 10:52 | tumer | in authorities i do not use fixed field/subfield |
| 10:52 | i myself use 001 for authid | |
| 10:52 | field 750$8 for linkid | |
| 10:53 | hdl | I agree on that point. This seems to me a good solution. |
| 10:53 | tumer | all user definable at koha_attr table |
| 10:53 | hdl | (authid) |
| 10:53 | tumer | yes even authid |
| 10:53 | hdl | But I saw on Authorities you commited : |
| 10:54 | ##Both authid and authtypecode is expected to be in the same field. Modify if other requirements arise | |
| 10:54 | tumer | that is old code |
| 10:54 | hdl | So I wondered If you still required such a thing. |
| 10:54 | (I thought it might be :) ) | |
| 10:54 | But was unsure of that. | |
| 10:55 | tumer | i have to clean that warning |
| 10:57 | hdl | what does nonav stand for in your code ? |
| 10:57 | auth_finder.pl?index=$myindex&nonav=$nonav&authtypecode=$authtypecode | |
| 10:57 | no navigation between authorities ? | |
| 10:57 | tumer | i use the same templates for popup in taht case i do not show the menus |
Today | Next day → | Search | Index