← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index
All times shown according to UTC.
| Time | Nick | Message |
|---|---|---|
| 17:02 | kados | @tell |
| 17:02 | dewey: @tell | |
| 17:02 | dewey | kados: sorry... |
| 17:02 | kados | dewey: ? |
| 17:02 | dewey | kados: wish i knew |
| 17:02 | kados | dewey: help |
| 20:11 | !tell | |
| 20:11 | @tell | |
| 20:11 | dewey: !tell | |
| 20:11 | dewey | kados: excuse me? |
| 20:11 | kados | dewey: tell |
| 20:11 | dewey | kados: what? |
| 20:35 | rach | howdy |
| 20:35 | dewey | hi, rach |
| 20:35 | rach | how are you dewey? |
| 02:46 | osmoze | hello |
| 08:33 | kados | hey owen |
| 08:33 | owen | G'morning |
| 09:28 | Bugzilla needs help | |
| 09:51 | kados | yea? |
| 10:15 | owen | When I go to http://bugs.koha.org, it says "I think you are looking for index.cgi" |
| 10:16 | And then redirects. But ever since the upgrade Bugzilla has had no style. | |
| 10:16 | And when I put in a search term under "Enter a bug # or some search terms:" it tells me I've entered an invalid bug number | |
| 10:25 | kados | paul are you around? |
| 10:26 | paul_away: having trouble with the .po translation system | |
| 10:28 | paul_away: i get a bunch of errors: | |
| 10:28 | Strange line in po/npl_opac_hu_HU.po: | |
| 10:28 | finally it dies with: | |
| 10:28 | po/npl_opac_hu_HU.po: PO file is corrupted, or not a PO file | |
| 10:29 | owen: sorry, I don't have access to the bugzilla server | |
| 10:29 | owen: have to wait till chris is up | |
| 10:32 | owen | It's no big deal. |
| 10:41 | kados: I have a statistics question for you | |
| 10:41 | kados | sure |
| 10:41 | owen | Do you think it is possible to generate a report of all active members, where active is defined by activitiy within the last X years? |
| 10:42 | kados | yea, piece of cake |
| 10:42 | just do a join on issues | |
| 10:42 | and if they've got an entry with a timestamp after X | |
| 10:42 | they they're active | |
| 10:42 | owen | Except that we've purged issues before haven't we? |
| 10:43 | kados | ahh ... |
| 10:43 | :-) | |
| 10:43 | not recently | |
| 10:43 | probably been a year or more | |
| 10:43 | owen | I see the statistics table includes borrowernumber...maybe from there? |
| 10:43 | kados | yep ... you could probably do something there |
| 10:43 | I've never purged stats | |
| 10:44 | owen | I was talking to Lauren after our meeting, and she mentioned something about the State library wanting us to 'purge our patron records' |
| 10:45 | I asked why, and she said they didn't want us reporting stats about numbers of library patrons if that number included inactive patrons | |
| 10:45 | So I said why purge the records, why not just give them a report that only included active members? | |
| 10:47 | kados | yep |
| 10:47 | in fact ... | |
| 10:47 | we can just check to see if a patron's account is expired | |
| 10:47 | no need to even touch statistics | |
| 10:49 | owen | That might be possible after we've worked under the improved expiration system in the next upgrade, but it wouldn't work right now |
| 10:49 | kados | why not? |
| 10:50 | owen | Because in all likelihood most of our patrons are expired right now and we don't even realize it. |
| 10:50 | kados | something like: |
| 10:50 | select count(*) from borrowers where expiry > '2004-01-01'; | |
| 10:50 | 24811 | |
| 10:50 | hmmm ... I'm pretty sure you can't issue books to an expired patron | |
| 10:50 | owen | That's not the case in NPL's production version |
| 10:51 | It doesn't care | |
| 10:51 | My record, for instance, expired 12/31/2005 | |
| 10:51 | kados | ahh |
| 10:51 | shoot | |
| 10:52 | when does lauren need those stats? | |
| 10:52 | owen | I'm not sure...I don't think it was very pressing |
| 11:53 | kados | osmoze: hi there |
| 11:53 | dewey | que tal, kados |
| 11:54 | osmoze | hi all :) |
← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index