← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index
All times shown according to UTC.
Time | Nick | Message |
---|---|---|
13:45 | kados | hey owen-away |
16:57 | thd-away: you around? | |
17:54 | thd- | kados: I am around now |
17:58 | thd | kados: did 73 records fail? |
18:21 | kados: The items have no LC call numbers or bar codes. | |
18:22 | kados: Had you forgotten to verify the script for that? | |
19:02 | kados: If you had import failure because of the presence standard 090 or 952 in the copy catalogued records, there is a solution that should be used even if there is no trouble. 090 and 952 in the original records should be moved to 09o and 95r respectively. 09o would then be a source of LC call numbers. The original record information should be preserved in this manner until we have a better solution. | |
19:04 | kados: Sorry that I had not been fully awake to remember that issue Thursday when we started looking at encoding. | |
19:58 | owen | kados: you around by any chance? |
20:13 | kados | owen: am now |
20:13 | owen: briefly ... what's up? | |
20:14 | thd | kados: do you see me questions and suggestions above? |
20:14 | kados | thd: yes |
20:15 | thd: the records you sent me don't include any way to map from the original fields to MARC | |
20:16 | thd | kados: yes the manual records would need to have any necessary extra information automatically mapped. |
20:18 | kados: I did not want to spend more time attempting to write support for extra values into the manual capture of the Z39.50 client. I had not even expected to find as many as I had manually. | |
20:20 | kados: was the presence of 090 in original records the reason that over 70 records failed rather than the character encoding problems of circa 15? | |
20:21 | kados | thd: I believe that I removed all tags with '9' in them |
20:21 | thd: though it would be worth it to investigate that | |
20:21 | thd: have you changed anything in the records? | |
20:22 | thd | kados: no the records I provided were just as downloaded. |
20:24 | kados | thd: I mean have you changed anything on the records I imported? |
20:24 | thd | kados: we sould preserve 090 in the records as 09o until you use of 090 changes to something else. |
20:24 | kados | thd: (wondering if I should attempt a re-import) |
20:25 | thd | kados: no once, I noticed no call numbers I presumed that your import script was unfinished so definitely reimport with a more complete script. |
20:26 | kados: 090 is the only place where LC call numbers will be found for many records. | |
20:27 | kados: LC call numbers will be variously in 050, 090, 852 as given in my pseudo code. | |
20:29 | kados | right |
20:30 | thd: I thought they wanted dewey call numbers | |
20:30 | thd: not LOC call numbers | |
20:30 | thd | kados: also, we need 952 $t to track distinct copy numbers in the traditional way. |
20:30 | kados | ? |
20:31 | thd: unfortunately, I can't work any more on this tonight | |
20:31 | thd | kados: They wanted LC call numbers the last time that you communicated with me in fact I think the advisement about the best choice was up to me. |
20:31 | kados | thd: will you be around tomorrow afternoon? |
20:32 | thd: ok | |
20:32 | thd: I'll work on improving the import script tomorrow | |
20:32 | thd | kados: yes, I will certainly be around but I did not want to abuse the deadline, given the Easter grace period. |
20:32 | kados | thd: well, we've little choice :-) |
20:33 | thd | kados: However, If your customer is happy I am happy. |
20:33 | kados: can you send me the script you have so far and I will write a better one. | |
20:35 | kados: MARC::Record looks very easy to work with but it would be much easier to work with what you already have. | |
09:45 | kados | morning all |
09:46 | ToinS | morning |
09:52 | kados | morning ToinS |
09:52 | ToinS: paul around? | |
09:52 | ToinS | no, i'm not with Paul today |
09:52 | kados | paul_away: you'll be happy to hear that Mike and I have arrived at a solution for the encoding probs |
09:52 | ToinS: ok :-) | |
09:53 | paul_away: it will remove handling of encoding in Koha and move it to the MARC::* modules | |
09:53 | paul_away: hope to be done this week |
← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index