← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index
All times shown according to UTC.
| Time | Nick | Message |
|---|---|---|
| 13:09 | hdl | ok. |
| 13:09 | thanks | |
| 15:41 | thd | kdaos: check your email please |
| 15:42 | s/kdaos/kados/ | |
| 16:35 | kados | thd: got it |
| 16:36 | thd: I'll forward it on | |
| 16:36 | thd | thanks kados |
| 17:01 | kados | thd: check pmesg |
| 22:52 | thd | kados: are you around? |
| 22:56 | mason | . |
| 08:14 | hdl | bonjour paul |
| 08:53 | kados | hi all |
| 08:54 | paul | hi kados |
| 08:54 | kados | paul: did you see Tumer Garip's koha-zebra message about Koha possibly dropping 090$c? |
| 08:54 | paul | nope. I was not at work this week. |
| 08:54 | back only this morning & hundred of mails to answer ! | |
| 08:54 | kados | sent March 23rd titled [Koha-zebra] Bad match criteria errors |
| 08:55 | heh, yea I can imagine | |
| 08:56 | paul | I can't find it |
| 08:56 | kados | I'll forward it to you |
| 08:57 | (perhaps it hasn't reached koha-zebra yet) | |
| 08:57 | but if it's true then it's quite alarming | |
| 08:57 | I first noticed missing 090$c s in NPL's data when I attempted to import it to zebra | |
| 08:57 | it seems Tumer has noticed the same | |
| 08:59 | paul | quite alarming I agree... |
| 08:59 | 090$c is mapped to biblionumber for you isn't it ? | |
| 09:07 | osmoze | hello |
| 09:15 | paul | joshua/kados : |
| 09:15 | this query show me all biblios without 090$9 (the biblionumber for me, in UNIMARC) | |
| 09:15 | SELECT m1.bibid, m2.bibid | |
| 09:15 | FROM marc_biblio AS m1 | |
| 09:15 | LEFT JOIN marc_subfield_table AS m2 ON m1.bibid = m2.bibid | |
| 09:15 | AND m2.tag = '090' | |
| 09:15 | AND m2.subfieldcode = '9' | |
| 09:15 | WHERE m2.bibid IS NULL | |
| 09:15 | I get no answer, so I think everything is OK for me. | |
| 09:16 | (I also tried to replace 090$9 by soimething else to be sure my query is OK : it seems it shows what i'm expecting) | |
| 09:16 | could you pls try this query & report the result ? | |
| 09:22 | kados | I'll try it |
| 09:25 | paul: would it be possible that $9 wouldn't be NULL but would be blank? | |
| 09:25 | my report: | |
| 09:25 | +--------+-------+ | |
| 09:25 | | bibid | bibid | | |
| 09:25 | +--------+-------+ | |
| 09:25 | | 1654 | NULL | | |
| 09:25 | paul | (on phone) |
| 09:25 | kados | | 158070 | NULL | |
| 09:25 | +--------+-------+ | |
| 09:25 | I'll respond to Tumer with the report | |
| 09:33 | ok ... mail to Tumer sent | |
| 09:33 | I wonder if the export/marc.pl script is to blame | |
| 09:34 | ie, perhaps it is not exporting things correctly | |
| 09:59 | thd | kados: well paul had said that script had a problem |
| 09:59 | kados | thd: what problem? |
| 10:00 | thd | kados: paul did not know or remember but there is a caution in the text on the intranet next to the function |
| 10:01 | kados: when I asked him why the caution was there months ago he could not remember the problem but suggested that I posted a bug | |
| 10:02 | kados: I never noticed a problem in my exports but I never looked at 090 in them | |
| 10:02 | kados: I never posted a bug for a problem that I could not describe or identify | |
| 10:03 | kados | make ss sense |
← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index