← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index
All times shown according to UTC.
| Time | Nick | Message |
|---|---|---|
| 12:08 | kados | owen: the reserves change is made to 101 ... let me know if it works |
| 12:08 | owen | Just that change, or a whole update? |
| 12:13 | Yes, it looks like it's fixed. | |
| 12:13 | kados | cool ... well I think 101 is fully updated ... as of yesterday |
| 12:13 | were there commits yesterday? | |
| 12:20 | thanks for the help on the reserves bug paul! | |
| 12:41 | hdl | owen : yes |
| 12:43 | owen | Oh yeah: How does the catalogue statistics page (catalogue_stats.pl) decide whether to use LoC, Dewey, etc? |
| 12:44 | hdl | You merely select if you want LoC or Dewey or else appear on Line or Column. |
| 12:44 | Anywhere else, it would act as filter. | |
| 12:45 | And these classifications appear only if you have data for these fields. | |
| 12:47 | owen | It's checking biblioitems? |
| 13:48 | hdl | sorry, I was on something else. |
| 13:50 | owen, what do you mean by that ? | |
| 13:51 | owen | when catalogue_stats.pl decides whether to use lccn, dewey, or itemcallnumber, it's checking the biblioitems table to see if there are values in those columns? And it picks whichever one is populated? |
| 15:00 | hdl | owen, sorry again : No, when there is lccn or dewey or itemcallnumber, you can choose the one you want for Line or Column... |
| 15:00 | owen | So the fact that I only see lccn means that it checked dewey and itemcallnumber and found them empty? |
| 15:00 | hdl | yes |
| 15:01 | owen | Okay. I've been updating the NPL templates and testing these scripts for the first time. |
| 15:01 | I haven't been able to get any of the wizards to work for me. | |
| 15:02 | hdl | What is the problem ? |
| 15:03 | owen | With borrowers_stats.pl for instance...I don't get any results at all! |
| 15:06 | hdl | let me see the logs. |
| 15:07 | Have you selected One Value for Line and One for Column ? | |
| 15:09 | owen | That must be where I'm going wrong! We should add something to the template that describes those requirements. |
| 16:35 | rach | hello |
| 17:38 | hi | |
| 17:45 | kados | hey there rach ;-) |
| 17:45 | chris around? | |
| 17:45 | I've got a potential client interested in Koha | |
| 17:46 | actually there are six libraries in a consortium interested | |
| 17:47 | so that will likely involve katipo | |
| 17:48 | as they would like consortium support built in | |
| 17:51 | rach | great |
| 17:51 | chris is on a clients site at the moment, so I'm not sure if he'll be at a desk | |
| 17:51 | but that is awesome news :-) | |
| 17:55 | kados | ;-) |
| 02:45 | paul | rach in bed or near keyboard ? |
| 02:47 | sylvain | hi |
| 02:47 | paul | salut |
| 02:51 | ca y est l'équipe de dév francaise est là | |
| 02:51 | sylvain | :) |
| 02:51 | alors paul c'est pour aujourd'hui la release ? | |
| 02:51 | paul | vivi |
| 02:52 | sylvain | cool ! |
| 02:52 | paul | (et ce sera qu'en VF et VO, puisque les autres traducteurs n'ont pas donné signe de vie. Par contre, j'ai du polonais qui est en train de se faire) |
| 02:53 | sylvain | sympa |
| 07:48 | kados | congrats on koha 2.2.2 paul! |
| 10:53 | paul's in the USA? | |
| 11:39 | owen | He must be on his way |
← Previous day | Today | Next day → | Search | Index